Sunday, December 04, 2005

Nuclear War by Febuary,March 2006 ?

" we could follow Mr. ElBaradei's advice and negotiate with a hell-bent for leather fanatically lead nuclear Iran, even as we have been unsuccessfully negotiating with a still non-nuclear Iran. It might work. On the other hand, you could ask the ghost of Neville Chamberlain how that worked out for him in 1939. "

Tony Blankley


(exerpt Haaretz)

Military Intelligence chief Major General Aharon Ze'evi (Farkash) last week said that diplomacy would have failed if Iran was still working on producing nuclear weapons by March.
"If by the end of March 2006, the international community does not manage to use diplomatic means to block Iran's effort to produce a nuclear bomb, there will no longer be any reason to continue diplomatic activity in this field, and it will be possible to say that the international attempts to thwart [Iran's efforts] have failed," Ze'evi said.
Several MKs said they thought Ze'evi was saying military efforts would become necessary by April.
"The comments by the head of Military Intelligence convey a harsh, worrying and dark picture," said Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Chairman MK Yuval Steinitz (Likud).
"Iran is going to become a nuclear power in the region and the world is helpless."

***************************
A few observations on the inevitable nuclear war approaching,triggered by Iran's drive for nuclear weapons with the sole purpose of finalizing Satan and Hitler's final solution against the Jews and Israel.

1. Iran has said out loud that they would not wait to be attacked.

Therefore it seems that instead of late March or April everything is going to explode sooner than expected ?

Don't the elites always get caught with their pants down ?

2. The new president of Iran is a megalomaniac and believes himself to be the one to do it ,that is destroy the infidel's of Israel and regain the honor for his god allah and Islam which have taken a beating from Israel with five major losses under their belt.

3. Growing signs of weakness from the U.S. and the West has emboldened Iran and Syria to bleed the illusionary superpower in Iraq, now spread too thin to do anything to end the threat in any positive or peaceful way.

4. Russia will not stand idly by with Iran as it did with Iraq, this is what will turn the events into an expanded nuclear war and where the U.S. will underestimate the Bear and get mauled severely.
Putin knows he will have to hit America hard.

5.I don't follow dreams and dreamers ,but there is one which has my attention.
The Jewish prophet Joel wrote that dreams and visions would come to many in these last days.
A fellow dreamed that when the U.S. initiated the blockade of Iran at the Gulf of Oman ,that Russia would sink a U.S. Aircraft Carrier with a nuke and this would set America's downfall in motion.
NATO & NORAD in Colorado was the next target he saw hit.
WWIII begins.

My sense is our perverse arrogance and pride as a superpower nation is finally humbled by God
giving Israel the impetus to seek Him alone for their salvation.

So when I hear Mr. President speak of a blockade against Iran ,then I'll know to pay even closer attention to this dream.

6.Israel has been pushed into a corner and weakened by the U.S.
The Bush Road Map 'for peace' has guaranteed war instead.
Weakening Israel by slicing off pieces to the terrorist led Palestinian's has encouraged Iran and the Islamic world to go for broke and end infidel occupation of once sacred Islamic land.

7.Israel has no choice but to attack and is slowly wakeing up to the reality that they have become the sacrificial offering of the West to Islam in salami slice stages.

8.The West will pay a fatal price for their betrayal of Israel and appeasing the followers of allah with Jewish blood.

Hey , don't be so surprised ,it's all been written long ago in the book ,the Jewish book which Christians call the Bible.

1 comment:

  1. US Intelligence Expert: Regime-Change the Answer in Iran
    16:52 Dec 13, '05 / 12 Kislev 5766
    By Ezra HaLevi


    Former U.S. Justice Department prosecutor and intelligence expert John Loftus says that Israel is unable to thwart Iran's nuclear projects through military action – but that there is an alternative.


    "Israel only has a few option and striking back is not one of 'em," Loftus told Israel National Radio's Tovia Singer. "The F-16-IL version that Israel possesses only has a combat radius of about 2,200 kilometers and you would need about 3,000 to hit the hard targets in Iran. Iran saw what [Israel] did to the Osarik reactor in Iraq and have spread their nuclear development stuff all over the country and a lot of the stuff is in the northeast corner of the country – completely out of Israel's flight range. So, unless Iraq votes to allow Israel overflight rights to attack Iran – which isn't going to happen - then Israel simply doesn't have the fuel to fly around Saudi Arabia to come up the Straits of Hormuz and attack Iran. There is simply not a military option available to Israel."

    Loftus stressed, however, that there are other options that are likely to succeed and are already being put into effect. "The Bush administration is hoping that, ironically with [French Prime Minister Jacques] Chirac's help, UN pressure will cause a regime-change in Syria. That the [UN's] Mehlis investigation [examining the Syrian government's connection to the assassination of former Lebanese PM Rafik Hariri] is going to come down hard and heavy. The US military is chomping at the bit to go across the border and take out the terror bases in Syria that Assad claims are not there. Once Syria is gone, Iran is isolated, with US troops on both their borders, in Afghanistan and in Iraq."

    The intelligence expert, who has contacts in the Pentagon, says that the strategy is not for the US to actually invade Iran, but to affect a regime-change. "One of the intelligence agencies, which shall remain nameless, asked me to hold a conference of dissident groups in Iran. We are holding that conference and getting ready for regime-change."

    Singer asked Loftus why US fighter jets do not bomb Iranian nuclear targets on their own from aircraft carriers in the region.

    "That's a real good question that has been carefully studied," Loftus answered. "There are over 360 separate targets inside Iran that have been identified. Most of them are non-vulnerable – many underneath residential neighborhoods and Islamic shrines. These are not places we can bomb. The Iranians were paying attention when Iraq's reactor was bombed and have learned the lessons."

    "So what is to be done to bring about a regime-change?" singer asked.

    "The aircraft carriers are there to defend the picket-line of ships that will place a blockade on the Straits of Hormuz," Loftus said. "Ninety percent of Iran's economy is based on oil exports – so a blockade of as little as three weeks can cause their economy to collapse, the people to rise up and the mullahs to be overthrown. The problem with this is that Iran knows that this is the most likely scenario and they have been preparing for three years to thwart it. They [Iran] have developed vessels whose job is to sink as many oil tankers as possible to block the Straits of Hormuz [to other countries that use that route]. Once two, three or four vessels are sunk, you have cut off 40% of the world's oil supply. So the US doesn't mind – we have a six-month stockpile of oil - but the EU is much more fragile and susceptible to oil shocks. So we might have to dump a large share of the US stockpile on the world market until the regime falls."

    Asked whether he really thinks the government will topple so easily, Loftus responded, "It is hard to do polling in Iran – you have to do it by telephone and you therefore only end up talking to the urban population. But we found that 83% of the Iranian urban population hates the mullahs and don't want to grow up under a dictatorship. Most of the country is young and wants music videos and TV and not the mullahs."

    ReplyDelete